Sep 16, 2010	Case: CT-008674-XEF	Judge Jeske
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for obstructing traffic at an intersection. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, glassy eyes, and slurred speech. The defendant performed field sobriety tests at the request of the officer. On the walk and turn, he took too many steps and on the one leg stand, he put his foot down. On the count backwards test he mixed up all the numbers and on the alphabet mixed up many letters. He was then arrested for DUI. All of which was video taped. He refused the breath test.
Result:	The State Dropped the DUI.

Sep 15, 2010	Case: 2010-CT-007722AXXX (JURY TRIAL)	Judge Moyle
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for weaving in and out of his lane at least eight times. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, bloodshot eyes, and a dazed look. The officer also testified that the defendant was off balance, uneasy, and uncooperative. The defendant refused the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. There was a video tape at the scene. After his arrest, he agreed to give a breath sample. However, on video at the breath testing facility, they stated he was playing games and they could not get two valid readings so the police called it a refusal. It should be noted, the State did get one valid reading and it was .192, which was not introduced into evidence. This was the defendant's second DUI within the last five years.
Result:	The Jury found the defendant Not Guilty.

Sep 15, 2010	Case: 2010-CT-007722AXXX (JURY TRIAL)	Judge Moyle
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for weaving in and out of his lane at least eight times. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, bloodshot eyes, and a dazed look. The officer also testified that the defendant was off balance, uneasy, and uncooperative. The defendant refused the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. There was a video tape at the scene. After his arrest, he agreed to give a breath sample. However, on video at the breath testing facility, they stated he was playing games and they could not get two valid readings so the police called it a refusal. It should be noted, the State did get one valid reading and it was .192, which was not introduced into evidence. This was the defendant's second DUI within the last five years.
Result:	The Jury found the defendant Not Guilty.

Sep 12, 2010	Case: 2518-XDP (JURY TRIAL)	Judge Krieger-Martin
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for making an illegal right on red. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, watery eyes, and slurred speech. The defendant performed the roadside tests. For example, on the walk and turn, he stepped off the line, did not touch heel to toe, and paused to regain his balance. On the one leg stand, he put his foot down four times and raised his arms for balance. He was arrested for DUI and refused the breath test.
Result:	The State Dropped the DUI.

Sep 12, 2010	Case: 2518-XDP (JURY TRIAL)	Judge Krieger-Martin
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for making an illegal right on red. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, watery eyes, and slurred speech. The defendant performed the roadside tests. For example, on the walk and turn, he stepped off the line, did not touch heel to toe, and paused to regain his balance. On the one leg stand, he put his foot down four times and raised his arms for balance. He was arrested for DUI and refused the breath test.
Result:	The State Dropped the DUI.

Sep 11, 2010	Case: CT-OO9808-GKF	Judge Jeske
Facts:	The defendant was stopped by the police based on a call about a reckless driver. Once stopped by police, the officer observed an odor of alcohol, red eyes, and slurred speech. According to the officer, he performed poorly on the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI.
Result:	The DUI was Dismissed.

Sep 11, 2010	Case: 2009-CT-002952	Judge Janecwicz
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and he spoke slowly. According to the officer, he performed poorly on the roadside tests. He was arrested for DUI, and blew a .123 and .116 in the breath machine.
Result:	The DUI was Dismissed.

Sep 11, 2010	Case: CT-OO9808-GKF	Judge Jeske
Facts:	The defendant was stopped by the police based on a call about a reckless driver. Once stopped by police, the officer observed an odor of alcohol, red eyes, and slurred speech. According to the officer, he performed poorly on the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI.
Result:	The DUI was Dismissed.

Sep 11, 2010	Case: 2009-CT-002952	Judge Janecwicz
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and he spoke slowly. According to the officer, he performed poorly on the roadside tests. He was arrested for DUI, and blew a .123 and .116 in the breath machine.
Result:	The DUI was Dismissed.

Sep 8, 2010	Case: CT-008942-XEF	Judge Lefler
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for weaving all over the roadway. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and the defendant admitted to drinking. He performed poorly on the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he blew a .153 and .145 in the breath machine.
Result:	The State Dropped the DUI.

Sep 8, 2010	Case: CT-008942-XEF	Judge Lefler
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for weaving all over the roadway. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot eyes, and the defendant admitted to drinking. He performed poorly on the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he blew a .153 and .145 in the breath machine.
Result:	The State Dropped the DUI.

Aug 30, 2010	Case: 6640-XDX	Judge Miranda
Facts:	A call went out about a burglar alarm going off in a neighborhood. Police arrived and stopped the defendant who was driving slowly. They noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and bloodshot eyes. He had trouble maintaining his balance once outside the car. He performed poorly on the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He then blew a .136 and .128 in the breath machine.
Result:	The State Dropped the DUI.

Aug 30, 2010	Case: 6640-XDX	Judge Miranda
Facts:	A call went out about a burglar alarm going off in a neighborhood. Police arrived and stopped the defendant who was driving slowly. They noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and bloodshot eyes. He had trouble maintaining his balance once outside the car. He performed poorly on the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He then blew a .136 and .128 in the breath machine.
Result:	The State Dropped the DUI.

Aug 27, 2010	Case: 2010-CT-00494-A-K	Judge Miller
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for running a red light. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and bloodshot eyes. He was also uneasy upon his feet and leaned on his car for balance. He then refused the roadside tests and the breath test.
Result:	The State Dropped the DUI.

Aug 27, 2010	Case: 2010-CT-00494-A-K	Judge Miller
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for running a red light. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and bloodshot eyes. He was also uneasy upon his feet and leaned on his car for balance. He then refused the roadside tests and the breath test.
Result:	The State Dropped the DUI.

Aug 26, 2010	Case: CT-6685-XEL	Judge Thomas
Facts:	An unknown person had called from a blockbuster video that the defendant was honking his horn repeatedly. Police arrived and found the defendant driving through the parking lot and they initiated a traffic stop. The officers observed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and he was repeating things. They also observed swaying and he admitted drinking beer. He performed very poorly on the video taped roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he blew a .142 and .139 in the breath machine.
Result:	The defense put forth that there was no legal basis for the traffic stop. The State Dropped the DUI.

Aug 26, 2010	Case: CT-6685-XEL	Judge Thomas
Facts:	An unknown person had called from a blockbuster video that the defendant was honking his horn repeatedly. Police arrived and found the defendant driving through the parking lot and they initiated a traffic stop. The officers observed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, and he was repeating things. They also observed swaying and he admitted drinking beer. He performed very poorly on the video taped roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he blew a .142 and .139 in the breath machine.
Result:	The defense put forth that there was no legal basis for the traffic stop. The State Dropped the DUI.

Aug 17, 2010	Case: 08-007011MM10A (JURY TRIAL)	Judge Cowart
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for driving with no headlights. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, glassy eyes, flushed face, and slurred speech. The officer who made the traffic stop then called for a DUI officer. He made somewhat similar observations. The defendant stated to the DUI officer he drank a few pints of beer and was viewed as being unsteady on his feet. According to the DUI officer, he performed poorly on the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he refused the breath test. This was the defendant's second DUI.
Result:	The Jury found the defendant Not Guilty.

Aug 17, 2010	Case: 2010-CT-005878AXXX	Judge Arias
Facts:	The defendant was seen speeding through a security gate by a civilian. The defendant then stopped, the police were called, and contact was made by the police who detained the defendant. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, several beer cans in the car, and watery eyes. The defendant swayed as he stood and admitted to drinking 4-5 beers. According to the officer, he performed poorly on the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI.
Result:	The State Dropped the DUI.

Aug 17, 2010	Case: 08-007011MM10A (JURY TRIAL)	Judge Cowart
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for driving with no headlights. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, glassy eyes, flushed face, and slurred speech. The officer who made the traffic stop then called for a DUI officer. He made somewhat similar observations. The defendant stated to the DUI officer he drank a few pints of beer and was viewed as being unsteady on his feet. According to the DUI officer, he performed poorly on the roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. After his arrest, he refused the breath test. This was the defendant's second DUI.
Result:	The Jury found the defendant Not Guilty.