May 31, 2023	Case: 22-CT-015443	Judge Farr
Facts:	The defendant was the at fault driver in a rear end crash. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, slow/slurred speech, watery eyes, and unsteady balance. The defendant performed very poorly on the field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. She later refused a breath test.
Defense:	Prior to trial, the firm provided medical documentation to the State from the defendant that the defendant suffered head injuries during the accident. Thus, there was doubt as to whether she was impaired by alcohol versus impairment because she was injured in the crash.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

May 31, 2023	Case: 22-CT-015976	Judge Farr
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for speeding. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, red/bloodshot eyes, and his balance was unsteady. There was also a strong odor of marijuana coming from the defendant's person. The defendant refused to perform field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
Defense:	After several conversations with State regarding the evidence, they Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

May 31, 2023	Case: 22-CT-016419	Judge Farr
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for driving with no lights after sunset. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot/glassy eyes, and lethargic movements. The defendant then performed various roadside tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused the breath test. This was the defendant's Second DUI and he was also charged with Second refusal for not taking a breath test.
Defense:	On tape, the defendant performed very poorly on the field sobriety tests such as the walk and turn and one leg stand. However, prior to the roadsides, none of his normal faculties were impaired. Our argument to the State was that the roadside tests are not normal activities. The State Dropped the defendant's Second DUI and he also received no further penalties on the refusal charge.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

May 30, 2023	Case: 21-003436CF10A	Judge Kollra
Facts:	The defendant was involved in a serious rear end collision resulting in several victims, including one driver who was in a Coma. The officers on scene made contact with the defendant and observed a strong odor of alcohol, unsteadiness on his feet, slurred speech, bloodshot eyes as well as a flushed face. The defendant performed and failed a series of field sobriety tests on video, including the walk and turn, one leg stand as well as the HGN (eye test), and was arrested for DUI Serious Bodily Injury as well as five (5) other counts of DUI with Injury and Property Damage. The defendant had a .147 blood alcohol level. The defendant scored between 24 months to 7 years in Florida State Prison.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton received a list of over 60 witnesses. In addition, we received several hours of body worn camera footage which included witness statements, the DUI investigation, as well as the hospital video with the defendant. The initial investigation by the police seemed to conclude that the defendant was driving at a high rate of speed and ultimately rear ended the victim who ended up in a coma. Parks & Braxton then began taking depositions of the State's witnesses. It soon became evident that many of the witnesses who gave sworn statements on video only heard the crash as it happened and didn't actually see the initial contact. In addition, Parks & Braxton was able to recreate the crash and prove that the victim first hit another car and then spun out into the middle of the roadway in front of the defendant's vehicle. Ultimately, the two crash investigators on scene agreed in deposition that the victim was the at fault driver in the crash. The felony DUI Serious Bodily Injury was dismissed. Four of the other DUI Injury and Property Damage counts were dismissed. The defendant received a misdemeanor DUI with probation.
Result:	The DUI with Serious Bodily Injury was Dismissed. Four (4) other counts of DUI Injury and Property Damage were Dismissed.

May 30, 2023	Case: 21-003436CF10A	Judge Kollra
Facts:	The defendant was involved in a serious rear end collision resulting in several victims, including one driver who was in a Coma. The officers on scene made contact with the defendant and observed a strong odor of alcohol, unsteadiness on his feet, slurred speech, bloodshot eyes as well as a flushed face. The defendant performed and failed a series of field sobriety tests on video, including the walk and turn, one leg stand as well as the HGN (eye test), and was arrested for DUI Serious Bodily Injury as well as five (5) other counts of DUI with Injury and Property Damage. The defendant had a .147 blood alcohol level. The defendant scored between 24 months to 7 years in Florida State Prison.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton received a list of over 60 witnesses. In addition, we received several hours of body worn camera footage which included witness statements, the DUI investigation, as well as the hospital video with the defendant. The initial investigation by the police seemed to conclude that the defendant was driving at a high rate of speed and ultimately rear ended the victim who ended up in a coma. Parks & Braxton then began taking depositions of the State's witnesses. It soon became evident that many of the witnesses who gave sworn statements on video only heard the crash as it happened and didn't actually see the initial contact. In addition, Parks & Braxton was able to recreate the crash and prove that the victim first hit another car and then spun out into the middle of the roadway in front of the defendant's vehicle. Ultimately, the two crash investigators on scene agreed in deposition that the victim was the at fault driver in the crash. The felony DUI Serious Bodily Injury was dismissed. Four of the other DUI Injury and Property Damage counts were dismissed. The defendant received a misdemeanor DUI with probation.
Result:	The DUI with Serious Bodily Injury was Dismissed. Four (4) other counts of DUI Injury and Property Damage were Dismissed.

May 25, 2023	Case: 21-002211MU10A	Judge Francois
Facts:	The defendant was found asleep parked in between two pumps at a gas station. The keys were in the ignition and the engine was running. The initial officer spoke with the employees inside the gas station and then made contact with the driver. The officer knocked on the window for a couple of minutes before the defendant woke up. The officer told the defendant to turn the car off and exit the vehicle. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, bloodshot eyes as well as a flushed face. In addition, the defendant was wet near the crotch and waistband area. A subsequent officer was called to the scene to conduct a DUI investigation. She asked the defendant for his driver's license and he handed over his garage door remote. The DUI officer began explaining the investigation to the defendant. The defendant made an aggressive move towards the officer and was then placed under arrest for DUI. The defendant subsequently refused to submit to a breath test.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton took the deposition of the two officers. The initial officer admitted that despite the defendant's condition he was unaware that the defendant was impaired prior to asking the defendant to turn off the vehicle. In addition, once the officer admitted to speaking with the gas station employees first, he couldn't then back track and say that he thought the defendant was possibly sick or injured. Parks & Braxton filed a motion to suppress based on an unlawful detention. Specifically, the officer testified that until he made physical contact with the defendant he agreed that there was no traffic infraction, no reasonable suspicion of a crime, and no reasonable belief that the defendant needed emergency assistance. On the morning of the motion, the prosecutor agreed to drop the DUI. The defendant walked away with no conviction on his record.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

May 25, 2023	Case: 21-002211MU10A	Judge Francois
Facts:	The defendant was found asleep parked in between two pumps at a gas station. The keys were in the ignition and the engine was running. The initial officer spoke with the employees inside the gas station and then made contact with the driver. The officer knocked on the window for a couple of minutes before the defendant woke up. The officer told the defendant to turn the car off and exit the vehicle. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, slurred speech, bloodshot eyes as well as a flushed face. In addition, the defendant was wet near the crotch and waistband area. A subsequent officer was called to the scene to conduct a DUI investigation. She asked the defendant for his driver's license and he handed over his garage door remote. The DUI officer began explaining the investigation to the defendant. The defendant made an aggressive move towards the officer and was then placed under arrest for DUI. The defendant subsequently refused to submit to a breath test.
Defense:	Parks & Braxton took the deposition of the two officers. The initial officer admitted that despite the defendant's condition he was unaware that the defendant was impaired prior to asking the defendant to turn off the vehicle. In addition, once the officer admitted to speaking with the gas station employees first, he couldn't then back track and say that he thought the defendant was possibly sick or injured. Parks & Braxton filed a motion to suppress based on an unlawful detention. Specifically, the officer testified that until he made physical contact with the defendant he agreed that there was no traffic infraction, no reasonable suspicion of a crime, and no reasonable belief that the defendant needed emergency assistance. On the morning of the motion, the prosecutor agreed to drop the DUI. The defendant walked away with no conviction on his record.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

May 24, 2023	Case: 23-CT-000154	Judge Dekleva
Facts:	The defendant was stopped as he was observed hugging the lane markers from one side to another and also abruptly changing lanes. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot/glassy eyes, and his speech was thick tongued. He had a strong smell of cologne and his mouth was very dry as he had to lick his lips numerous times. He denied having anything to drink, however, later he stated he had drank a beer. He then performed the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand. He was then arrested for DUI and later refused a breath test.
Defense:	The firm raised issues as to the lawfulness of traffic stop due the lack of specifics provided regarding the driving pattern.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

May 24, 2023	Case: 23-101730MMDL	Judge C. Miller
Facts:	The defendant was stopped after being observed with his tires well past the stop bar. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, slightly slurred speech, and glassy eyes. The defendant denied drinking and then later stated he had drank beer. After performing various field sobriety tests, he was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test. This was the defendant's Second DUI arrest.
Defense:	The officer had no clue how to position his body worn camera. When the defendant was performing the walk and turn, no one could see his legs from the knees down. Thus, no one could see if he was touching heel to toe or if he was stepping off the line. On the one leg stand, we could not see from the knees down as well. Again, no one could see whether he actually put his foot down. After speaking with the State, they Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

May 24, 2023	Case: 23-101730MMDL	Judge C. Miller
Facts:	The defendant was stopped after being observed with his tires well past the stop bar. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, slightly slurred speech, and glassy eyes. The defendant denied drinking and then later stated he had drank beer. After performing various field sobriety tests, he was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test. This was the defendant's Second DUI arrest.
Defense:	The officer had no clue how to position his body worn camera. When the defendant was performing the walk and turn, no one could see his legs from the knees down. Thus, no one could see if he was touching heel to toe or if he was stepping off the line. On the one leg stand, we could not see from the knees down as well. Again, no one could see whether he actually put his foot down. After speaking with the State, they Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

May 24, 2023	Case: 23-CT-000154	Judge Dekleva
Facts:	The defendant was stopped as he was observed hugging the lane markers from one side to another and also abruptly changing lanes. The officer observed an odor of alcohol, bloodshot/glassy eyes, and his speech was thick tongued. He had a strong smell of cologne and his mouth was very dry as he had to lick his lips numerous times. He denied having anything to drink, however, later he stated he had drank a beer. He then performed the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand. He was then arrested for DUI and later refused a breath test.
Defense:	The firm raised issues as to the lawfulness of traffic stop due the lack of specifics provided regarding the driving pattern.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

May 23, 2023	Case: 22-CT-017772	Judge Farr
Facts:	While the defendant's boyfriend was being detained, the defendant tried to drive off. Officers had told her do not drive away because she had been drinking. Once they stopped her, they noticed an odor of alcohol, glassy eyes, and slurred speech. She was also unsteady. After performing various roadside tests, she was arrested for DUI. She later blew a .179 and .178 in the breath machine.
Defense:	Officers had no legal basis after only limited observations of the defendant to justify ordering her to not drive. The State agreed and Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

May 23, 2023	Case: 23-CT-001509	Judge Conrad
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for driving on the rim of her car. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, glassy eyes, and an unsteady stance. The defendant stated she had consumed two vodkas. She then performed various roadside tests and was DUI. She later blew a .149 and .141 in the breath machine.
Defense:	After negotiating with the State regarding the evidence, they Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

May 23, 2023	Case: 23-CT-002299	Judge Conrad
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for running a red light. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, red eyes, and slurred speech. The defendant admitted to having drank three beers and a shot. After performing field sobriety tests, he was arrested for DUI. He later blew a .124, .102 and .105 in the breath machine.
Defense:	The first time the defendant blew, there were issues with the first two samples. The second time, they then got three samples instead of the required two. The firm raised reliability issues with the State about the breath results and the machine.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

May 23, 2023	Case: 23-CT-002299	Judge Conrad
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for running a red light. The officer noticed an odor of alcohol, red eyes, and slurred speech. The defendant admitted to having drank three beers and a shot. After performing field sobriety tests, he was arrested for DUI. He later blew a .124, .102 and .105 in the breath machine.
Defense:	The first time the defendant blew, there were issues with the first two samples. The second time, they then got three samples instead of the required two. The firm raised reliability issues with the State about the breath results and the machine.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

May 23, 2023	Case: 22-CT-017772	Judge Farr
Facts:	While the defendant's boyfriend was being detained, the defendant tried to drive off. Officers had told her do not drive away because she had been drinking. Once they stopped her, they noticed an odor of alcohol, glassy eyes, and slurred speech. She was also unsteady. After performing various roadside tests, she was arrested for DUI. She later blew a .179 and .178 in the breath machine.
Defense:	Officers had no legal basis after only limited observations of the defendant to justify ordering her to not drive. The State agreed and Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

May 23, 2023	Case: 23-CT-001509	Judge Conrad
Facts:	The defendant was stopped for driving on the rim of her car. Officers noticed an odor of alcohol, glassy eyes, and an unsteady stance. The defendant stated she had consumed two vodkas. She then performed various roadside tests and was DUI. She later blew a .149 and .141 in the breath machine.
Defense:	After negotiating with the State regarding the evidence, they Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

May 19, 2023	Case: 22-CT-042779	Judge Silverman
Facts:	The defendant crashed her car into a bunch of trees, a basketball hoop, and she ended up against a house. When officers arrived, the defendant admitted to having blacked out. They noticed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol and glassy/dilated pupils. She fumbled with her documents, admitted to having drank gin, and she also repeated the same questions over and over. She then performed various roadside tests such as the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand. She was then arrested for DUI Property Damage and later blew a .118 and .114 in the breath machine.
Defense:	After conversations with the prosecutor regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

May 19, 2023	Case: 22-CT-053369	Judge Silverman
Facts:	The defendant tried to negotiate a curve too fast and lost control. He then crashed his car over a cement median divider and ended up in grass ditch line. His car damaged trees, as well as being destroying itself. When officers arrived, they noticed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol, stuttering speech, and bloodshot eyes. He had to lean against things for balance. The defendant refused to perform field sobriety tests and was arrested for DUI. He later refused a breath test.
Defense:	After negotiations with the prosecutor regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.

May 19, 2023	Case: 22-CT-042779	Judge Silverman
Facts:	The defendant crashed her car into a bunch of trees, a basketball hoop, and she ended up against a house. When officers arrived, the defendant admitted to having blacked out. They noticed the defendant to have an odor of alcohol and glassy/dilated pupils. She fumbled with her documents, admitted to having drank gin, and she also repeated the same questions over and over. She then performed various roadside tests such as the HGN (eye test), walk and turn, and one leg stand. She was then arrested for DUI Property Damage and later blew a .118 and .114 in the breath machine.
Defense:	After conversations with the prosecutor regarding the evidence and the defendant, the State Dropped the DUI.
Result:	The State dropped the DUI.